@kayvonf I think many people were confused about the relation of this slide to the previous. This implementation does not accurately portray the operation that was intended on the previous slide (where dependencies are in 4 directions). I think the point was to recognize that this implementation does something different, but it might be useful to add a clarifying slide afterwards?
@kayvonf I think many people were confused about the relation of this slide to the previous. This implementation does not accurately portray the operation that was intended on the previous slide (where dependencies are in 4 directions). I think the point was to recognize that this implementation does something different, but it might be useful to add a clarifying slide afterwards?