Can someone clarify why there's 2x overhead in the example above where the program stores 16 values? Is it due to having to load the line from memory whereas ideally we wouldn't have to and store it directly somehow?
cube
@Corian Yes, it would be faster just to store without having to load first, if all you were doing was writing without reading.
Can someone clarify why there's 2x overhead in the example above where the program stores 16 values? Is it due to having to load the line from memory whereas ideally we wouldn't have to and store it directly somehow?
@Corian Yes, it would be faster just to store without having to load first, if all you were doing was writing without reading.